FINAL TOOLBOX
02 // Visual Math & Finance Solversx̄_w = (w₁x₁ + w₂x₂ + w₃x₃) / (w₁ + w₂ + w₃)

Visual Weighted Average & Center-of-Mass Fulcrum Beam

The weighted arithmetic mean $\bar{x}_w = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n w_i x_i}{\sum_{i=1}^n w_i}$ is mathematically identical to the physical center of mass where net rotational torque $\sum w_i(x_i - \bar{x}_w) = 0$ balances a rigid lever.

x̄_w = (w₁x₁ + w₂x₂ + w₃x₃) / (w₁ + w₂ + w₃)

Inputs & Parameters (6)

pt
0pt±1100pt
%
1%±1100%
pt
0pt±1100pt
%
1%±1100%
pt
0pt±1100pt
%
1%±1100%
0102030405060708090100x₁=65 (w=25)x₂=82 (w=35)x₃=94 (w=40)Simple Mean = 80.3▲ FULCRUM x̄_w = 82.55
Weighted Mean (Fulcrum)
82.55
∑(wᵢxᵢ) = 8,255 / ∑w = 100
Unweighted Simple Mean
80.33
Weighting shift Δ = +2.22
Normalized Shares
25 / 35 / 40%
Relative mass distribution on beam
Balanced Torque (∑τ = 0)
±458
Equal counter-clockwise & clockwise moments

20-Row Comparison Table

Compare across:
#Value 1 (x₁) (pt)Weighted Mean (x̄_w)Simple MeanWeight Shift Δ
010 pt66.358.67+7.63
025 pt67.5560.33+7.22
0311 pt69.0562.33+6.72
0416 pt70.364+6.3
0521 pt71.5565.67+5.88
0626 pt72.867.33+5.47
0732 pt74.369.33+4.97
0837 pt75.5571+4.55
0942 pt76.872.67+4.13
1047 pt78.0574.33+3.72
1153 pt79.5576.33+3.22
1258 pt80.878+2.8
1363 pt82.0579.67+2.38
1468 pt83.381.33+1.97
1574 pt84.883.33+1.47
1679 pt86.0585+1.05
1784 pt87.386.67+0.63
1889 pt88.5588.33+0.22
1995 pt90.0590.33-0.28
20100 pt91.392-0.7
Was this tool helpful?

Key Analytical Takeaways

  • 01Increasing a category's weight $w_i$ pulls the triangular fulcrum toward $x_i$ just like adding mass to one side of a seesaw.
  • 02When all weights are equal ($w_1 = w_2 = w_3$), the weighted fulcrum collapses to the simple arithmetic mean $(x_1 + x_2 + x_3)/3$.
  • 03Notice how the clockwise torque on the right of the fulcrum exactly cancels the counter-clockwise torque on the left.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do the weights in a weighted average have to add up to 100%?+

No. The formula automatically normalizes each weight by dividing by the sum of all weights (w₁ + w₂ + w₃), so raw credit hours, share counts, or percentages all work directly.

Why is the weighted mean equivalent to the center of gravity?+

In statics, a horizontal beam balances at point x̄ when total torque Σ w_i(x_i − x̄) = 0. Solving for x̄ gives Σ(w_i·x_i) / Σ(w_i).

What happens if the weights do not sum to 100% (or 1.0)?+

The weighted average formula automatically normalizes arbitrary positive weights by dividing ∑(wᵢ·xᵢ) by the total weight sum ∑wᵢ, so credit hours (3, 4, 3) work without manual scaling.